Left Of Bush's Term



The Web

Violette's Page


News In Police Brutality


Cop Stop Survival Guide


Ten Things Not To Do If Arrested


Police Brutality Cases
Did the cops overreact in these cases?


The Third Degree
One of the most effective and commonly used tactics is the "fabrication of evidence" ploy.


The Military Model
The view of cops as soldiers.

 


Subscribe to
Violette's Page!
Your email address:
Violette's Page... Patriotically Incorrect since 1999
Study Tracks Police Brutality Claims
Guardian Unlimited

Sunday June 25, 2006 10:01 PM

By MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Eight percent of citizen complaints that police officers used too much force turned up enough evidence to justify discipline of an officer, a Justice Department survey of large state and local forces reported Sunday.

The survey by department's Bureau of Justice Statistics found that 26,556 complaints of excessive police force were filed in 2002 with state and local law enforcement agencies that have at least 100 full-time officers.

Taken together, police agencies of this size account for 59 percent of the nation's law enforcement officers but only about 5 percent of law enforcement agencies in the country.

The data was collected in 2003, the first time the government asked about the outcome of citizen complaints about police use of force. So there is no historical data with which to compare the results.

At the time of the survey, a year after the complaints were lodged, some 94 percent of the complaints had a final disposition. The survey found these outcomes among the cases that had reached final disposition:

-34 percent of these complaints turned up insufficient evidence to prove the allegation.

-25 percent of them were ruled unfounded, meaning either that the complaint was not based on facts or the reported incident did not occur.

-23 percent of the complaints ended with the exoneration of the accused officers as having performed lawfully.

-8 percent were sustained, meaning that sufficient evidence was found to justify disciplining the accused officers.

-9 percent had some other disposition, such as withdrawal of the complaint.

The figures add to 99 percent rather than 100 percent because of rounding.

Using the complaints that found discipline justified, the bureau estimated there were 2,000 instances of excessive police force among large departments in 2002. That is a rate of one incident per 200 full-time officers.

Almost one-fifth of large municipal police departments had a civilian complaint review board or agency within their jurisdiction. Those with such a civilian board had a high rate of complaints than those without such a board, 11.9 versus 6.6 complaints per 100 officers.

Advocates of civilian review boards long have maintained that abused citizens are more willing to bring complaints to civilians than to officers of the department they believed abused them.


reprinted from The New Standard

June 27 - Thousands of public complaints are made against police officers for using violence against civilians, but an overwhelming majority do not result in disciplinary action against the officers in question, according to a new report from the US Department of Justice.

The agency reviewed 26,556 "citizen complaints" filed during 2002 at state and local law-enforcement agencies. Out of that number, just 8 percent were sustained with enough evidence to justify taking punitive action against the accused officer. The report did not say how often or in or what ways officers in this group were disciplined.

In nearly one-half of the cases reviewed, authorities exonerated officers despite allegations that they acted excessively; in about a third of incidents, investigators said they did not find enough evidence that unlawful force was used.

The DoJ report lacks specific accounts of police conduct, let alone victims' or witnesses' perspectives.

The author also neglected to define "use of force," a term used regularly in the report, which was released Sunday. The Department states on its website that there is "no single, accepted definition among the researchers, analysts or the police." The report does, however, take pains to define "use of excessive force" - when officers uses too much violence - and "excessive use of force" - when officers use violence legally but in too many incidents.

The report also cautioned that complaint data is inconsistent across agencies. The report's author, statistician Matthew Hickman, wrote that the quality of records - in addition to differences in receiving, processing, and recording complaints - affects the volume and rate of complaints reported across law-enforcement agencies.

For example, the review found that departments with an internal audit division had a higher rate of complaints than those without. Additionally, officers were more than twice as likely to be exonerated at departments that lacked such a division.

Furthermore, wrote Hickman, "[use-of-]force complaints represent a subset of all force events. That is, not all [use-of-]force events result in citizens filing formal complaints."

According to another DoJ-authored report, based on the Department's 2002 "Contacts Between the Police and the Public" survey, less than 20 percent of respondents who reported experiencing what they said was excessive threat or use of force, took formal action such as filing a complaint or lawsuit. The study extrapolated that a total of 664,500 people in the United States - or about 1.5 percent of those who had contact with police - experienced a use of force by police. Three quarters of them perceived it to be "excessive."

Police watchdogs agree that complaint statistics are inaccurate. The American Civil Liberties Union states on its website that figures are marred by agencies' reluctance to provide information and by data that is difficult to interpret. According to the ACLU, "the number of complaints counted is also affected by whether or not the internal-affairs system accepts anonymous complaints and complaints by phone or mail, or requires in-person, sworn statements."

Human Rights Watch has also documented hurdles in the police-accountability process. "Complainants, whether they are victims or witnesses, may not know where to go to file a complaint," the group wrote in 1998. "They may have difficulty communicating due to language barriers, or they may be met with hostility by officers who do not wish to receive a complaint about a colleague. ... Officers receiving complaints may ask questions that reveal they do not believe the complainant, or they may ask about the complainant's criminal history or charges that may be pending as a result of the arrest that gave rise to the alleged abuse incident."

Even greater obstacles are cropping up in some places. In Minnesota, a new law could further discourage people from filing complaints. Lawmakers passed a "false reporting" bill last year that makes it illegal to report a claim of police misconduct that is not proven to be true.

Communities United Against Police Brutality, a Twin Cities police watchdog group, questions just who would be determining whether or not a brutality complaint is false under the bill. "This law is clearly meant to frighten people away from filing complaints against abusive police officers," the group said in a petition.

Earlier this month, a coalition of community groups in Richmond, Virginia held a protest to voice frustration with police using what they considered excessive force, especially against black residents. The rally followed the city's decision not to prosecute an officer involved in a fatal shooting of an unarmed man, and a judge's dismissal of criminal charges against an officer accused of assaulting and cursing at a woman during a traffic stop.

Many community activists have long agitated for more accountability of officers who brutalize civilians. Some have formed Copwatch groups to "police the police" in places like Berkley, Brooklyn and Portland, Oregon.

In a growing number of cities, communities have lobbied for and organized civilian complaint review boards (CCRB) to review allegations of police misconduct. According to the DoJ report released this week, about one-fifth of large municipal police forces are overseen by such a board. The report noted that cities with CCRBs tend to receive more complaints, but it did not address the cause-or-effect relationship between the boards, incidences of alleged abuse and actual complaint-filing rates.

Some groups have criticized CCRBs, claiming they are not truly independent and lack the tools necessary to effectively hold officers accountable for wrongdoing. The DoJ report found that only about one-in-four CCRBs had independent investigative authority with subpoena powers.

The recent DoJ report also found that in the three quarters of municipalities that allowed police to unionize, residents filed police brutality complaints at significantly higher rates and those complaints were less than half as likely to be sustained.

The DoJ said the citizen-complaint survey report was part of its "continuing efforts to develop data resources on police use of force."

© 2006 The NewStandard. All rights reserved.

Latest Articles





FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.